Inmaek/ Yonjul (South Korea) - Revision history

Admin at 15:19, 29 September 2019

2019-09-29T15:19:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 29 September 2019
Line 8:		Line 8:
	[[:Category:Redistribution\|Redistribution]] – [[:Category: Substantive ambivalence\| Substantive ambivalence]] – [[:Category: Instrumentality of sociability\| Instrumentality of sociability]] – [[:Category: Economies of favours\| Economies of favours]]		[[:Category:Redistribution\|Redistribution]] – [[:Category: Substantive ambivalence\| Substantive ambivalence]] – [[:Category: Instrumentality of sociability\| Instrumentality of sociability]] – [[:Category: Economies of favours\| Economies of favours]]
	\| categories =		\| categories =
	[[:Category:South Korea\|South Korea]] – [[:Category: East Asia\| East Asia]] – [[:Category: Ties\| Ties]] – [[:Category: Euphemism\| Euphemism]] – [[:Category: Personal ~~network~~\| Personal ~~network~~]] – [[:Category: Favour\| Favour]]		[[:Category:South Korea\|South Korea]] – [[:Category: East Asia\| East Asia]] – [[:Category: Ties\| Ties]] – [[:Category: Euphemism\| Euphemism]] – [[:Category: Personal connections\| Personal connections]] – [[:Category: Favour\| Favour]]
	\| authorofpiece =Sven Horak		\| authorofpiece =Sven Horak
	\| authorinstitution =Department of Management, St. John’s University, USA		\| authorinstitution =Department of Management, St. John’s University, USA
Line 21:		Line 21:
	[[Category: Ties]]		[[Category: Ties]]
	[[Category: Euphemism]]		[[Category: Euphemism]]
	[[Category: Personal ~~network~~]]		[[Category: Personal connections]]
	[[Category: Favour]]		[[Category: Favour]]
	[[Category:Entry]]		[[Category:Entry]]

Editor2018 at 21:08, 16 May 2019

2019-05-16T21:08:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 16 May 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\| definition =Lit. ‘people entangled like vine’, network of social ties and relationships developed in the course of one’s life		\| definition =Lit. ‘people entangled like vine’, network of social ties and relationships developed in the course of one’s life
	\| location =South Korea		\| location =South Korea
	\| imagemap =~~South Korea~~ map.png		\| imagemap =SouthKorea map.png
	\| clusters =		\| clusters =
	[[:Category:Redistribution\|Redistribution]] – [[:Category: Substantive ambivalence\| Substantive ambivalence]] – [[:Category: Instrumentality of sociability\| Instrumentality of sociability]] – [[:Category: Economies of favours\| Economies of favours]]		[[:Category:Redistribution\|Redistribution]] – [[:Category: Substantive ambivalence\| Substantive ambivalence]] – [[:Category: Instrumentality of sociability\| Instrumentality of sociability]] – [[:Category: Economies of favours\| Economies of favours]]

Editor2018 at 19:02, 16 May 2019

2019-05-16T19:02:17Z

Show changes

Admin at 09:47, 9 May 2019

2019-05-09T09:47:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:47, 9 May 2019
Line 12:		Line 12:
	<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">		<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">

	''Inmaek'' (인맥), in Korean, means ‘people entangled like vine’ (Yee 2015: 3<ref>Yee, J. 2015. 'Social Capital in Korea: Relational Capital, Trust, and Transparency', ''International Journal of Japanese Sociology'', 24(1): 30–47.</ref>) and refers to a network of social ties and relationships one develops in the course of life (Horak 2014 <ref>Horak, S. 2014. 'Antecedents and Characteristics of Informal Relation-Based Networks in Korea: Yongo , Yonjul and Inmaek', ''Asia Pacific Business Review'', 20(1): 78–108.</ref>). Although distinctively Korean, ''inmaek'' ties can be described as equating with and having an identical construct to the much studied Chinese ''guanxi'' (Yang 1996, Fan 2002; Ho and Redfern 2010; Lin and Ho 2010<ref> Lin, L.-H. and Ho, Y.-L. 2010. 'Guanxi and OCB: The Chinese Cases', ''Journal of Business Ethics'', 96(2): 285–98.</ref>; J.-D. Luo 2011<ref>Luo, J.-D. 2011. 'Guanxi Revisited: An Exploratory Study of Familiar Ties in a Chinese Workplace', ''Management and Organization Review'', 7(2): 329–51. </ref>; Y. Luo 2000<ref>Luo, Y. 2000. 'Guanxi and Business', in Y. Luo (ed.), ''Guanxi and Business''. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company. </ref>) or ''blat''in Russia (see both in this volume). Although ''inmaek'' ties can be established purposefully, an action shared with ''yonjul'' (see ''yonjul'' in this volume), they can also emerge without any instrumental intentions (Horak 2014<ref> Horak, S. 2014. 'Antecedents and Characteristics of Informal Relation-Based Networks in Korea: Yongo , Yonjul and Inmaek', ''Asia Pacific Business Review'', 20(1): 78–108.</ref>). The social connection is conventionally developed between individuals from the same home town or alumni, people who do military service together (a relatively strong tie in Korea), ex-colleagues of a workplace who remain connected, or between people who share a hobby or are members of the same sports club. In contrast to the pillars of ''yongo'' – family, region and alumni (see ''yongo'' in this volume), the pillars upon which ''inmaek'' ties are based are more diverse. These include the notions of affection and loyalty between individuals (Lew 2013<ref>Lew, S.-C. 2013. ''The Korean Economic Development Path – Confucian Tradition, Affective Network''. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. </ref>), and forging informal personal relationships as an important factor in interpersonal transactions in business, politics and society as a whole (Y. Kim 2008 <ref>Kim, Y. 2008. 'Personal Ties Still Important, but Patterns Changing', In K. Kim and KoreaHerald (eds.), ''Social Change in Korea'' (pp. 136–44). Gyeonggi-do, South Korea: Jimoondang.</ref>). As ''inmaek'' stands for a social network in general it can include ''yongo'' and ''yonjul'' ties (both in this volume). Ties can be interrelated and develop dynamically, i.e. ''inmaek'' (as well as ''yongo'') can serve as a fundament to develop ''yonjul'' ties (see Figure 1).		''Inmaek'' (인맥), in Korean, means ‘people entangled like vine’ (Yee 2015: 3<ref>Yee, J. 2015. 'Social Capital in Korea: Relational Capital, Trust, and Transparency', ''International Journal of Japanese Sociology'', 24(1): 30–47.</ref>) and refers to a network of social ties and relationships one develops in the course of life (Horak 2014 <ref>Horak, S. 2014. 'Antecedents and Characteristics of Informal Relation-Based Networks in Korea: Yongo , Yonjul and Inmaek', ''Asia Pacific Business Review'', 20(1): 78–108.</ref>). Although distinctively Korean, ''inmaek'' ties can be described as equating with and having an identical construct to the much studied Chinese ''[[guanxi]]'' (Yang 1996, Fan 2002; Ho and Redfern 2010; Lin and Ho 2010<ref> Lin, L.-H. and Ho, Y.-L. 2010. 'Guanxi and OCB: The Chinese Cases', ''Journal of Business Ethics'', 96(2): 285–98.</ref>; J.-D. Luo 2011<ref>Luo, J.-D. 2011. 'Guanxi Revisited: An Exploratory Study of Familiar Ties in a Chinese Workplace', ''Management and Organization Review'', 7(2): 329–51. </ref>; Y. Luo 2000<ref>Luo, Y. 2000. 'Guanxi and Business', in Y. Luo (ed.), ''Guanxi and Business''. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company. </ref>) or ''[[blat]]'' in Russia (see both in this volume). Although ''inmaek'' ties can be established purposefully, an action shared with ''yonjul'' (see ''yonjul'' in this volume), they can also emerge without any instrumental intentions (Horak 2014<ref> Horak, S. 2014. 'Antecedents and Characteristics of Informal Relation-Based Networks in Korea: Yongo , Yonjul and Inmaek', ''Asia Pacific Business Review'', 20(1): 78–108.</ref>). The social connection is conventionally developed between individuals from the same home town or alumni, people who do military service together (a relatively strong tie in Korea), ex-colleagues of a workplace who remain connected, or between people who share a hobby or are members of the same sports club. In contrast to the pillars of ''yongo'' – family, region and alumni (see ''yongo'' in this volume), the pillars upon which ''inmaek'' ties are based are more diverse. These include the notions of affection and loyalty between individuals (Lew 2013<ref>Lew, S.-C. 2013. ''The Korean Economic Development Path – Confucian Tradition, Affective Network''. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. </ref>), and forging informal personal relationships as an important factor in interpersonal transactions in business, politics and society as a whole (Y. Kim 2008 <ref>Kim, Y. 2008. 'Personal Ties Still Important, but Patterns Changing', In K. Kim and KoreaHerald (eds.), ''Social Change in Korea'' (pp. 136–44). Gyeonggi-do, South Korea: Jimoondang.</ref>). As ''inmaek'' stands for a social network in general it can include ''yongo'' and ''yonjul'' ties (both in this volume). Ties can be interrelated and develop dynamically, i.e. ''inmaek'' (as well as ''yongo'') can serve as a fundament to develop ''yonjul'' ties (see Figure 1).

Admin at 14:37, 8 October 2018

2018-10-08T14:37:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 8 October 2018
Line 41:		Line 41:
	[[Category: Mutual Help]]		[[Category: Mutual Help]]
	[[Category:Help]]		[[Category:Help]]
	[[Category: ~~Social~~ Exchange]]		[[Category: Exchange]]
	[[Category: Positive Relational Capital]]		[[Category: Positive Relational Capital]]
	[[Category:Entry]]		[[Category:Entry]]

Admin at 14:20, 8 October 2018

2018-10-08T14:20:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:20, 8 October 2018
Line 38:		Line 38:
	[[Category: Connections]]		[[Category: Connections]]
	[[Category: Relationships]]		[[Category: Relationships]]
	~~[[Category: Social Connections]]~~
	[[Category: Problem-solving]]		[[Category: Problem-solving]]
	[[Category: Mutual Help]]		[[Category: Mutual Help]]

Admin at 16:08, 5 October 2018

2018-10-05T16:08:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:08, 5 October 2018
Line 41:		Line 41:
	[[Category: Problem-solving]]		[[Category: Problem-solving]]
	[[Category: Mutual Help]]		[[Category: Mutual Help]]
			[[Category:Help]]
	[[Category: Social Exchange]]		[[Category: Social Exchange]]
	[[Category: Positive Relational Capital]]		[[Category: Positive Relational Capital]]
	[[Category:Entry]]		[[Category:Entry]]

Admin at 16:00, 5 October 2018

2018-10-05T16:00:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 5 October 2018
Line 36:		Line 36:
	[[Category: The Instrumentality of Sociability]]		[[Category: The Instrumentality of Sociability]]
	[[Category: Network]]		[[Category: Network]]
	[[Category: ~~Informal Ties~~]]		[[Category: Connections]]
	[[Category: Relationships]]		[[Category: Relationships]]
	[[Category: Social Connections]]		[[Category: Social Connections]]

Admin at 15:23, 29 June 2018

2018-06-29T15:23:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 29 June 2018
Line 43:		Line 43:
	[[Category: Social Exchange]]		[[Category: Social Exchange]]
	[[Category: Positive Relational Capital]]		[[Category: Positive Relational Capital]]
			[[Category:Entry]]

Admin: Admin moved page Inmaek/ Yonjul to Inmaek/ Yonjul (South Korea) without leaving a redirect

2018-06-01T10:52:21Z

Admin moved page Inmaek/ Yonjul to Inmaek/ Yonjul (South Korea) without leaving a redirect

← Older revision	Revision as of 10:52, 1 June 2018
(No difference)