Difference between revisions of "Comparative Analyses"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
In the editorial entitled [http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/idps/article/view/19900/16956 Informality and policy in the making: four flavours to explain the essence of informality] in the [http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/idps/issue/view/1605 special issue] of Interdisciplinary Political Studies (2(4)/2018), Abel Polese proposes a framework for classifying informal practices according to the context within which they are set: political domain, economic domain, corruption and 'infrapolitics'. | In the editorial entitled [http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/idps/article/view/19900/16956 Informality and policy in the making: four flavours to explain the essence of informality] in the [http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/idps/issue/view/1605 special issue] of Interdisciplinary Political Studies (2(4)/2018), Abel Polese proposes a framework for classifying informal practices according to the context within which they are set: political domain, economic domain, corruption and 'infrapolitics'. | ||
==[[ | ==[[Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat]]== | ||
'''''By Giulio, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL''''' | '''''By Giulio Benedetti, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL''''' | ||
The [[essay]] engages with Douglas North's idea of open- and limited-access societies and through a comparison of internal dynamics in elite groups in [[dirt book]] and [[kompromat]] practices, challenges North's proposition. | The [[Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat|essay]] engages with Douglas North's idea of open- and limited-access societies and through a comparison of internal dynamics in elite groups in [[dirt book]] and [[kompromat]] practices, challenges North's proposition. | ||
Revision as of 15:36, 25 January 2019
Four flavours of informality
By Abel Polese, Tallinn University
In the editorial entitled Informality and policy in the making: four flavours to explain the essence of informality in the special issue of Interdisciplinary Political Studies (2(4)/2018), Abel Polese proposes a framework for classifying informal practices according to the context within which they are set: political domain, economic domain, corruption and 'infrapolitics'.
Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat
By Giulio Benedetti, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL
The essay engages with Douglas North's idea of open- and limited-access societies and through a comparison of internal dynamics in elite groups in dirt book and kompromat practices, challenges North's proposition.