Difference between revisions of "Comparative Analyses"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The [[Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat|essay]] engages with Douglas North's idea of open- and limited-access societies and through a comparison of internal dynamics in elite groups developed through the [[dirt book]] and [[kompromat]] practices, challenges North's proposition. | The [[Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat|essay]] engages with Douglas North's idea of open- and limited-access societies and through a comparison of internal dynamics in elite groups developed through the [[dirt book]] and [[kompromat]] practices, challenges North's proposition. | ||
==Why compare informal practices around the world?== | |||
{{#ev:vimeo|274156897}} | |||
'''Find more videos on informality [[Informality interviews|here]].''' | |||
Revision as of 15:55, 17 November 2019
Informality in Ukraine and beyond: one name, different flavours...with a cheer for the Global Encyclopaedia of Informality
By Abel Polese, Dublin City University, Ireland
In the essay, Abel Polese proposes a framework for classifying informal practices according to the context within which they are set: informal governance, shadow economy, informal payments and policy-making.
Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat
By Giulio Benedetti, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL
The essay engages with Douglas North's idea of open- and limited-access societies and through a comparison of internal dynamics in elite groups developed through the dirt book and kompromat practices, challenges North's proposition.
Why compare informal practices around the world?
Find more videos on informality here.