Difference between revisions of "Comparative Analyses"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{#ev:vimeo|274156897}} | |||
'''Find more videos on informality [[Informality interviews|here]].''' | |||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
==[[Informality in Ukraine and beyond: one name, different flavours...with a cheer for the Global Encyclopaedia of Informality]]== | ==[[Informality in Ukraine and beyond: one name, different flavours...with a cheer for the Global Encyclopaedia of Informality]]== | ||
| Line 11: | Line 14: | ||
The [[Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat|essay]] engages with Douglas North's idea of open- and limited-access societies and through a comparison of internal dynamics in elite groups developed through the [[dirt book]] and [[kompromat]] practices, challenges North's proposition. | The [[Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat|essay]] engages with Douglas North's idea of open- and limited-access societies and through a comparison of internal dynamics in elite groups developed through the [[dirt book]] and [[kompromat]] practices, challenges North's proposition. | ||
Revision as of 15:57, 17 November 2019
Find more videos on informality here.
Informality in Ukraine and beyond: one name, different flavours...with a cheer for the Global Encyclopaedia of Informality
By Abel Polese, Dublin City University, Ireland
In the essay, Abel Polese proposes a framework for classifying informal practices according to the context within which they are set: informal governance, shadow economy, informal payments and policy-making.
Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat
By Giulio Benedetti, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL
The essay engages with Douglas North's idea of open- and limited-access societies and through a comparison of internal dynamics in elite groups developed through the dirt book and kompromat practices, challenges North's proposition.