Difference between revisions of "Category:Lock-in effect"

From Global Informality Project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Category: Cluster The following practices are associated with the 'lock-in effect'.")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category: Cluster]]
[[Category: Cluster]]
The following practices are associated with the 'lock-in effect'.
The following practices are associated with the 'lock-in effect'.  The encouragement of perceptions of belonging, through practices and rituals related to their reinforcement, functions both as a
source of norms and, in some instances, as a source of power under conditions of social or political subjection. At the same time, the same sets of practices can also function as means of subordination of the individual to imposed identities, and flattening of the diverse social landscape into a restricted number of categories.

Revision as of 13:48, 28 April 2020

The following practices are associated with the 'lock-in effect'. The encouragement of perceptions of belonging, through practices and rituals related to their reinforcement, functions both as a source of norms and, in some instances, as a source of power under conditions of social or political subjection. At the same time, the same sets of practices can also function as means of subordination of the individual to imposed identities, and flattening of the diverse social landscape into a restricted number of categories.