Difference between revisions of "Comparative Analyses"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
==[ | ==[[Informality in Ukraine and beyond: one name, different flavours...with a cheer for the Global Encyclopaedia of Informality]== | ||
'''''By Abel Polese, | '''''By Abel Polese, Dublin City University, Ireland''''' | ||
In the | In the essay, Abel Polese proposes a framework for classifying informal practices according to the context within which they are set: political domain, economic domain, corruption and 'infrapolitics'. | ||
==[[Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat]]== | ==[[Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat]]== | ||
Revision as of 12:54, 31 January 2019
[[Informality in Ukraine and beyond: one name, different flavours...with a cheer for the Global Encyclopaedia of Informality]
By Abel Polese, Dublin City University, Ireland
In the essay, Abel Polese proposes a framework for classifying informal practices according to the context within which they are set: political domain, economic domain, corruption and 'infrapolitics'.
Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat
By Giulio Benedetti, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL
The essay engages with Douglas North's idea of open- and limited-access societies and through a comparison of internal dynamics in elite groups developed through the dirt book and kompromat practices, challenges North's proposition.