Difference between revisions of "Comparative Analyses"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''''By Abel Polese, Dublin City University, Ireland''''' | '''''By Abel Polese, Dublin City University, Ireland''''' | ||
In the essay, Abel Polese proposes a framework for classifying informal practices according to the context within which they are set: | In the essay, Abel Polese proposes a framework for classifying informal practices according to the context within which they are set: informal governance, shadow economy, informal payments and policy-making. | ||
==[[Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat]]== | ==[[Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat]]== | ||
Revision as of 17:35, 1 February 2019
Informality in Ukraine and beyond: one name, different flavours...with a cheer for the Global Encyclopaedia of Informality
By Abel Polese, Dublin City University, Ireland
In the essay, Abel Polese proposes a framework for classifying informal practices according to the context within which they are set: informal governance, shadow economy, informal payments and policy-making.
Informality and the social orders of access: the cases of dirt book and kompromat
By Giulio Benedetti, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL
The essay engages with Douglas North's idea of open- and limited-access societies and through a comparison of internal dynamics in elite groups developed through the dirt book and kompromat practices, challenges North's proposition.