Difference between revisions of "Category:Substantive ambivalence"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Editor2018 (talk | contribs) |
Editor2018 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category: Cluster]] | [[Category: Cluster]] | ||
In exploring whether it is possible to separate a relationship from the use of that relationship, the entries in this category highlight the ambivalent nature of relationships – seen by participants as social, but by observers as instrumental, but indeed neither, or both. The substantive ambivalence of informal exchanges – where one cannot agree or disagree with either participants or observers – means that any single categorisation of the way in which gifts, favours, transfers and transactions are given, taken or exchanged would be reductionist. | |||
Revision as of 07:34, 29 April 2020
In exploring whether it is possible to separate a relationship from the use of that relationship, the entries in this category highlight the ambivalent nature of relationships – seen by participants as social, but by observers as instrumental, but indeed neither, or both. The substantive ambivalence of informal exchanges – where one cannot agree or disagree with either participants or observers – means that any single categorisation of the way in which gifts, favours, transfers and transactions are given, taken or exchanged would be reductionist.
Pages in category "Substantive ambivalence"
The following 47 pages are in this category, out of 47 total.