Difference between revisions of "Mordida (Mexico)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
861 bytes added ,  16:16, 17 May 2019
no edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{infobox
{{infobox  
  | nameofpractice = Mordida
| nameofpractice =Mordida
  | location = Mexico
| flagemoji =🇲🇽
  | imagemap = Mexico map.png
| definition =Lit. ‘to bite’, euphemism for a bribe or backhander
  | imageflag = Mexico flag.png
| location =Mexico
  | authorofpiece = Claudia Baez Camargo
| imagemap =Mexico map.png
  | authorinstitution = Basel Institute on Governance
| clusters =
}}
[[:Category:Redistribution|Redistribution]] – [[:Category: Substantive ambivalence| Substantive ambivalence]] – [[:Category: Sociability of instrumentality| Sociability of instrumentality]] – [[:Category: Economies of favours| Economies of favours]]
 
| categories =
'''''Original Text: Claudia Baez Camargo, Basel Institute on Governance'''''
[[:Category:Mexico|Mexico]] – [[:Category: North America| North America]] – [[:Category: Latin America| Latin America]] – [[:Category: Euphemism| Euphemism]] – [[:Category: Food| Food]] – [[:Category: Bribe| Bribe]] – [[:Category: Payment| Payment]] – [[:Category: Favour| Favour]]
 
| authorofpiece =Claudia Baez-Camargo
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">
| authorinstitution =Basel Institute on Governance, Switzerland
In Mexico, ''mordida'' is a term widely used to refer to a bribe<ref>Morris, S. D. 2003. ‘Corruption and Mexican Political Culture’, Journal of the Southwest, 45(4): 671–708.</ref>. The word literally translates as ‘bite’ from Spanish. While the origins of this secondary use of the word are contested, probably the most recurrent explanation given by Mexicans is that it alludes to police officers and other public officials being seen as dogs, on the lookout for an innocent citizen to take a bite out of. It is significant that several studies<ref>Del Castillo, A., and Guerrero, M. A. 2003. ‘Percepciones de La Corrupción En La Cuidad de México¿ Predisposición Al Acto Corrupto?.’ Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, http://presupuestoygastopublico.org/documentos/transparencia/DT_134.pdf</ref><ref>Bailey, J. and P. Paras. 2006. ‘Perceptions and Attitudes about Corruption and Democracy in Mexico’. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos, 22 (1): 57–82, doi:10.1525/msem.2006.22.issue-1.</ref> have found that ''mordida'' is the one practice consistently identified by Mexicans as an unambiguous expression of corruption, whereas, in spite of an increasing awareness of the impact of corruption, average citizens appear to struggle to come up with a more abstract definition of the concept<ref>Del Castillo, A., and Guerrero, M. A. 2003. ‘Percepciones de La Corrupción En La Cuidad de México¿ Predisposición Al Acto Corrupto?.’ Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, http://presupuestoygastopublico.org/documentos/transparencia/DT_134.pdf</ref>.
| authorwebsite =[https://www.baselgovernance.org/about-us/people/claudia-baez-camargo Profile page at BG]}}
 
<big>'''By Claudia Baez-Camargo, Basel Institute on Governance, Switzerland'''</big>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
[[Category:Redistribution]]
[[Category: Substantive ambivalence]]
[[Category: Sociability of instrumentality]]
[[Category: Economies of favours]]
[[Category:Mexico]]
[[Category: North America]]
[[Category: Latin America]]
[[Category: Euphemism]]
[[Category: Food]]
[[Category: Bribe]]
[[Category: Payment]]
[[Category: Favour]]
[[Category:Entry]]
[[Category: Volume 1]]
{| class="wikitable"
|-  
|style="font-size:1.1em;"|In Mexico, ''mordida'' is a term widely used to refer to a bribe<ref>Morris, S. D. 2003. ‘Corruption and Mexican Political Culture’, Journal of the Southwest, 45(4): 671–708.</ref>. The word literally translates as ‘bite’ from Spanish. While the origins of this secondary use of the word are contested, probably the most recurrent explanation given by Mexicans is that it alludes to police officers and other public officials being seen as dogs, on the lookout for an innocent citizen to take a bite out of. It is significant that several studies<ref>Del Castillo, A., and Guerrero, M. A. 2003. ‘Percepciones de La Corrupción En La Cuidad de México¿ Predisposición Al Acto Corrupto?.’ Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, http://presupuestoygastopublico.org/documentos/transparencia/DT_134.pdf</ref><ref>Bailey, J. and P. Paras. 2006. ‘Perceptions and Attitudes about Corruption and Democracy in Mexico’. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos, 22 (1): 57–82, doi:10.1525/msem.2006.22.issue-1.</ref> have found that ''mordida'' is the one practice consistently identified by Mexicans as an unambiguous expression of corruption, whereas, in spite of an increasing awareness of the impact of corruption, average citizens appear to struggle to come up with a more abstract definition of the concept<ref>Del Castillo, A., and Guerrero, M. A. 2003. ‘Percepciones de La Corrupción En La Cuidad de México¿ Predisposición Al Acto Corrupto?.’ Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, http://presupuestoygastopublico.org/documentos/transparencia/DT_134.pdf</ref>.
|}
[[File:mordida.jpg|400px|thumb|left|Police officers have a literal bite in Mexico City]]
[[File:mordida.jpg|400px|thumb|left|Police officers have a literal bite in Mexico City]]


As well as ''mordida'', the term ''soborno'' also translates as ‘bribe’ in English. However, some authors (for example Coronado 2008<ref>Coronado, G. 2008. ‘Discourses of Anti-Corruption in Mexico. Culture of Corruption or Corruption of Culture?’, PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 5(1), http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/portal/article/view/479</ref>) have suggested a subtle difference in meaning between the two terms. Thus, while ''soborno'' is presumed to be a serious crime (involving large amounts of money), ''mordida'' refers to commonly occurring petty corruption transactions, and is associated with what Covarrubias González <ref>Covarrubias González, I. 2003. ‘El Impacto de La Corrupción En El Proceso de Democratización de México’, Revista Probidad, 24 (9): 1–14.</ref> refers to as the ‘folklore of corruption’ pervading Mexican popular culture. In this latter connotation, ''mordida'' may be understood as one of many practices from the toolkit of informal strategies that Mexicans often employ in order to deal with a state that is perceived as undemocratic and abusive. Other examples of such informal strategies used in Mexico include the use of ''palancas'' (levers, which refer to the use of personal connections to insiders or influential actors in order to obtain preferential treatment), ''coyotes'' (persons who are paid to do others’ administrative transactions, frequently through use of personal contacts inside the organization), and giving ''regalos'' (gifts)<ref>Coronado, G. 2008. ‘Discourses of Anti-Corruption in Mexico. Culture of Corruption or Corruption of Culture?’, PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 5(1), http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/portal/article/view/479</ref>.
As well as ''mordida'', the term ''soborno'' also translates as ‘bribe’ in English. However, some authors (for example Coronado 2008<ref>Coronado, G. 2008. ‘Discourses of Anti-Corruption in Mexico. Culture of Corruption or Corruption of Culture?’, PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 5(1), http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/portal/article/view/479</ref>) have suggested a subtle difference in meaning between the two terms. Thus, while ''soborno'' is presumed to be a serious crime (involving large amounts of money), ''mordida'' refers to commonly occurring petty corruption transactions, and is associated with what Covarrubias González <ref>Covarrubias González, I. 2003. ‘El Impacto de La Corrupción En El Proceso de Democratización de México’, Revista Probidad, 24 (9): 1–14.</ref> refers to as the ‘folklore of corruption’ pervading Mexican popular culture. In this latter connotation, ''mordida'' may be understood as one of many practices from the toolkit of informal strategies that Mexicans often employ in order to deal with a state that is perceived as undemocratic and abusive. Other examples of such informal strategies used in Mexico include the use of [[palanca|''palancas'']] (levers, which refer to the use of personal connections to insiders or influential actors in order to obtain preferential treatment), ''coyotes'' (persons who are paid to do others’ administrative transactions, frequently through use of personal contacts inside the organization), and giving ''regalos'' (gifts)<ref>Coronado, G. 2008. ‘Discourses of Anti-Corruption in Mexico. Culture of Corruption or Corruption of Culture?’, PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 5(1), http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/portal/article/view/479</ref>.


There are several reasons why the ''mordida'' is a pervasive practice in Mexico. Firstly, the ''mordida'' is widely viewed as necessary because of the perception that Mexican laws and regulations are so difficult to comply with that people feel they are left with no choice but to find an arrangement through extra-legal means<ref>Morris, S. D. 2003. ‘Corruption and Mexican Political Culture’, Journal of the Southwest, 45(4): 671–708.</ref>. Furthermore, excessive red tape is often exploited by unscrupulous bureaucrats, who arbitrarily come up with endless requirements to complete an administrative process. For instance, it is not uncommon for people seeking everyday public services (renewing a driving licence, obtaining a birth certificate, regularising a land title, applying for construction permits etc.) to be asked to present documents never mentioned before or listed anywhere, or to be sent through an endless succession of queues. Alternatively, as Coronado<ref>Coronado, G. 2008. ‘Discourses of Anti-Corruption in Mexico. Culture of Corruption or Corruption of Culture?’, PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 5(1), http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/portal/article/view/479</ref> narrates, the public official can also play upon the possibility that the applicant’s documents may ‘get lost’ or the procedure could be ‘delayed’; it is not uncommon to ask for a ‘tip’ after the paperwork has been submitted, ‘ahí lo que quiera dar para la cooperación del juez’ (‘whatever you would like to give for the judge’s cooperation’). The overall effect of these patterns is to create a sense of unpredictability when citizens engage with state officials. Not surprisingly, in some cases, citizens resort to a ''mordida'' as a preemptive action just to avoid time-consuming procedures.
There are several reasons why the ''mordida'' is a pervasive practice in Mexico. Firstly, the ''mordida'' is widely viewed as necessary because of the perception that Mexican laws and regulations are so difficult to comply with that people feel they are left with no choice but to find an arrangement through extra-legal means<ref>Morris, S. D. 2003. ‘Corruption and Mexican Political Culture’, Journal of the Southwest, 45(4): 671–708.</ref>. Furthermore, excessive red tape is often exploited by unscrupulous bureaucrats, who arbitrarily come up with endless requirements to complete an administrative process. For instance, it is not uncommon for people seeking everyday public services (renewing a driving licence, obtaining a birth certificate, regularising a land title, applying for construction permits etc.) to be asked to present documents never mentioned before or listed anywhere, or to be sent through an endless succession of queues. Alternatively, as Coronado<ref>Coronado, G. 2008. ‘Discourses of Anti-Corruption in Mexico. Culture of Corruption or Corruption of Culture?’, PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 5(1), http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/portal/article/view/479</ref> narrates, the public official can also play upon the possibility that the applicant’s documents may ‘get lost’ or the procedure could be ‘delayed’; it is not uncommon to ask for a ‘tip’ after the paperwork has been submitted, ‘ahí lo que quiera dar para la cooperación del juez’ (‘whatever you would like to give for the judge’s cooperation’). The overall effect of these patterns is to create a sense of unpredictability when citizens engage with state officials. Not surprisingly, in some cases, citizens resort to a ''mordida'' as a preemptive action just to avoid time-consuming procedures.
Line 33: Line 50:


At the national level, there are several instruments that quantify the prevalence of the ''mordida'' in Mexico. One example is the Índice de Corrupción y Buen Gobierno published by Transparencia Mexicana, which ranks 35 public services according to the frequency of  households reporting to have used a ''mordida'' to obtain a service (Transparencia Mexicana 2011). Another available data source is the Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP): it conducts surveys every other year, including questions on the prevalence of ''mordidas'' given to police officers and other public officers. The results are published the results in a searchable database.
At the national level, there are several instruments that quantify the prevalence of the ''mordida'' in Mexico. One example is the Índice de Corrupción y Buen Gobierno published by Transparencia Mexicana, which ranks 35 public services according to the frequency of  households reporting to have used a ''mordida'' to obtain a service (Transparencia Mexicana 2011). Another available data source is the Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP): it conducts surveys every other year, including questions on the prevalence of ''mordidas'' given to police officers and other public officers. The results are published the results in a searchable database.
</div>
</div>
==Notes==
<references />


[[Category:Informal Practices]]
==References==
[[Category:Mexico]]
[[Category:Central America]]
[[Category:Substantive]]
[[Category:Language of informality]]
[[Category:Substantive]]
[[Category:Gift]]
[[Category:Payment]]
[[Category:Bribery]]
Contributor, Editor, Supervisor
2,313

edits

Navigation menu