Difference between revisions of "Ideas for Future Research"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 138: Line 138:
*[[Carrots versus sticks in patron–client networks|Prof Paul Heywood]], Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Nottingham,
*[[Carrots versus sticks in patron–client networks|Prof Paul Heywood]], Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Nottingham,
*[[Brodiazhnichestvo|Sheelagh Barron]], SSEES alumna
*[[Brodiazhnichestvo|Sheelagh Barron]], SSEES alumna
*[[Blat (Russia)|Alena Ledeneva]], SSEES, UCL
*[[Blat (Russia)|Prof Alena Ledeneva]], SSEES, UCL


First, we asked either information communication technologies (ICTs) allow to replicate traditional informal practices relying on new digital tools or we can actually see that ICTs contribute to innovation on the field of informal practices and give a rise to new practices. We divided our discussion between focus on the emergence of new actors that rely on ICTs in order to perform informal practices, and on the traditional actors that use ICTs.
First, we asked either information communication technologies (ICTs) allow to replicate traditional informal practices relying on new digital tools or we can actually see that ICTs contribute to innovation on the field of informal practices and give a rise to new practices. We divided our discussion between focus on the emergence of new actors that rely on ICTs in order to perform informal practices, and on the traditional actors that use ICTs.
Line 175: Line 175:
*'''Dr Vesna Popovski, Visiting Lecturer, Department of Government, LSE'''
*'''Dr Vesna Popovski, Visiting Lecturer, Department of Government, LSE'''
*[[Dirt book|Dr Anna Bailey]], SSEES alumna
*[[Dirt book|Dr Anna Bailey]], SSEES alumna
*[[Krugovaia poruka|Prof Geoffrey Hosking]], Emeritus Professor of Russian History, SSEES, UCL


Informal governance is almost as broad as informality itself, the participants brought up very different aspects of informality during the discussion  
Informal governance is almost as broad as informality itself, the participants brought up very different aspects of informality during the discussion  

Navigation menu