Difference between revisions of "Sosyudad (Philippines)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 74: Line 74:
asymmetrically contoured mainstream social arrangement. In the ''sosyudad'', ''communitas'' is
asymmetrically contoured mainstream social arrangement. In the ''sosyudad'', ''communitas'' is
generated through the reversal of the norms of status quo, which allows practitioners a respite
generated through the reversal of the norms of status quo, which allows practitioners a respite
from hegemonic social structures. Thus, to be able to sustain active participation in the ''sosyudad'',
from hegemonic social structures.  
 
Thus, to be able to sustain active participation in the ''sosyudad'',
a member must cultivate the practical competency involved in conjuring up the ''communitas''-like
a member must cultivate the practical competency involved in conjuring up the ''communitas''-like
state during sessions. But in spite of being a practice of reversal and resistance, the ''sosyudad''
state during sessions. But in spite of being a practice of reversal and resistance, the ''sosyudad''
Line 102: Line 104:
exchange circles of farmers called ''cumbinyu'' (from the Spanish ''convenio'' meaning ‘conference’)
exchange circles of farmers called ''cumbinyu'' (from the Spanish ''convenio'' meaning ‘conference’)
that had decided to extend their regular congregations beyond the working seasons in the fields
that had decided to extend their regular congregations beyond the working seasons in the fields
through weekly drinking sessions. Labour-exchange arrangements were popular in agricultural
through weekly drinking sessions.  
 
Labour-exchange arrangements were popular in agricultural
Philippines until recently, specifically in small-scale cultivation, and practiced along various
Philippines until recently, specifically in small-scale cultivation, and practiced along various
aspects of farming such as clearing of land, planting, irrigation, and harvesting. They were
aspects of farming such as clearing of land, planting, irrigation, and harvesting. They were
Line 116: Line 120:
and Zialcita 1981<ref>Zialcita, F. N. 1981. ‘Kinsmen and Voluntary Associations in Two Iocano Communities,’
and Zialcita 1981<ref>Zialcita, F. N. 1981. ‘Kinsmen and Voluntary Associations in Two Iocano Communities,’
Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, in Anthropology: University of Hawaii.</ref>). Other informal cooperative systems were also popular all over Philippine
Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, in Anthropology: University of Hawaii.</ref>). Other informal cooperative systems were also popular all over Philippine
rural society, some of them still being practiced today. For example, the ''atag'' in Catanduanes is a
rural society, some of them still being practiced today.  
 
For example, the ''atag'' in Catanduanes is a
mobilisation of voluntary labour for community purposes such as church-building or clean-up
mobilisation of voluntary labour for community purposes such as church-building or clean-up
campaigns. Neighbours in Virac may be summoned for a ''duksoy'', a day of free labour to assist
campaigns. Neighbours in Virac may be summoned for a ''duksoy'', a day of free labour to assist
Line 144: Line 150:
Involvement in Representative Democracies. London: Routledge pp. 1-14.</ref>. Purportedly, they are virtual training grounds for participation in the larger polity;
Involvement in Representative Democracies. London: Routledge pp. 1-14.</ref>. Purportedly, they are virtual training grounds for participation in the larger polity;
the greater such civil society translates into more vibrant democratic governance. Can this be
the greater such civil society translates into more vibrant democratic governance. Can this be
said of the ''sosyudad''? The impact of the ''sosyudad'' on the broad scheme of Catandunganon
said of the ''sosyudad''?  
 
The impact of the ''sosyudad'' on the broad scheme of Catandunganon
society, even as a form of reversal and resistance, is at best ambivalent. It represents the limited
society, even as a form of reversal and resistance, is at best ambivalent. It represents the limited
small-scale sort of civil society, that while being a practice of egalitarian relations, hardly makes
small-scale sort of civil society, that while being a practice of egalitarian relations, hardly makes
Contributor, Editor, Supervisor
2,305

edits

Navigation menu