Contributor, Editor, Supervisor
2,313
edits
Difference between revisions of "Chaa pani (India)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Editor2018 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{infobox | nameofpractice = Chaa pani | flagemoji = 🇮🇳 | definition = Euphemism for petty bribery; informal payments for a service | location = India | imagemap = India...") |
Editor2018 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|style="font-size:1.1em;"| ''Chaa pani'' literally means tea and water. The term originates from Punjab region in the northern part of India (Positive Purchasing 2016). The term has a range of connotations, from bribery in business or government or paying a little extra to get things done, to obtaining driving licence or visiting a new-born (Campion 2011). Unlike bribery, ''chaa pani'' is not always associated with injustice, unfairness or anti-democratic activity. The ambivalent term refers to both paying someone off and to an innocent gesture of hospitality. When it refers to making payments, such payments are made with an expectation of receiving a counter-favour, ordinarily not a monetary one. | |style="font-size:1.1em;"| ''Chaa pani'' literally means tea and water. The term originates from Punjab region in the northern part of India (Positive Purchasing 2016). The term has a range of connotations, from bribery in business or government or paying a little extra to get things done, to obtaining driving licence or visiting a new-born (Campion 2011). Unlike bribery, ''chaa pani'' is not always associated with injustice, unfairness or anti-democratic activity. The ambivalent term refers to both paying someone off and to an innocent gesture of hospitality. When it refers to making payments, such payments are made with an expectation of receiving a counter-favour, ordinarily not a monetary one. | ||
In India, although often labelled as the world’s largest democracy, informality remains a key part of the socio-economic contexts, from informal settlements to the culture of personalised trust. India has strong foundations in unofficial communities and in what known but not addressed in human interaction. Common informal practices in India include ''[[jaan pehchaan]]'', using one’s social network to further oneself, and ''[[hawala]]'', an informal money exchange. ''Chaa pani'' is thought of as legitimate if it takes the form of small-scale informal payments, but not bribery. ''Chaa pani'' is a softer version of the more direct term ''rishwat'', which translates into the pejorative term for a corrupt bribe. Unlike ''rishwat'', the meaning of ''chaa pani'' is determined by the listener. If used in business or governance, ''chaa pani'' does not directly point to engagement in corruption, but it does suggest self-interested behaviour or competitive advantage within potentially corrupt institutions. While an informal payment might offer a solution to a person in need, it also creates a problem – a bribe disrupts legitimacy, undermines democracy and subverts the impartial workings of institutions. As both a solution and problem, ''chaa pani'' reinforces [[:Category: | In India, although often labelled as the world’s largest democracy, informality remains a key part of the socio-economic contexts, from informal settlements to the culture of personalised trust. India has strong foundations in unofficial communities and in what known but not addressed in human interaction. Common informal practices in India include ''[[jaan pehchaan]]'', using one’s social network to further oneself, and ''[[hawala]]'', an informal money exchange. ''Chaa pani'' is thought of as legitimate if it takes the form of small-scale informal payments, but not bribery. ''Chaa pani'' is a softer version of the more direct term ''rishwat'', which translates into the pejorative term for a corrupt bribe. Unlike ''rishwat'', the meaning of ''chaa pani'' is determined by the listener. If used in business or governance, ''chaa pani'' does not directly point to engagement in corruption, but it does suggest self-interested behaviour or competitive advantage within potentially corrupt institutions. While an informal payment might offer a solution to a person in need, it also creates a problem – a bribe disrupts legitimacy, undermines democracy and subverts the impartial workings of institutions. As both a solution and problem, ''chaa pani'' reinforces [[:Category:Functional ambivalence|functional ambivalence]] (see Merton 1977: 92). | ||
|} | |} | ||